Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Negara melalui Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara

Abstract

The settlement of state administrative disputes constitutes a fundamental mechanism for ensuring legal protection for individuals and for upholding the principle of the rule of law. State administrative disputes arise from governmental administrative decisions or actions that result in legal harm to citizens or private legal entities. The State Administrative Court (Administrative Court) was established as a specialized judicial institution vested with the authority to review the legality of governmental administrative decisions and actions in accordance with statutory provisions and the general principles of good governance. This research adopts a normative juridical method, employing both a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The findings demonstrate that the Administrative Court serves not only as a means of legal protection for affected parties but also as an instrument of judicial control over governmental administrative conduct. Developments in state administrative law, particularly following the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, have broadened the scope of justiciable administrative disputes and strengthened the role of the Administrative Court in promoting legal certainty, justice, and accountable governance.