Kajian Tujuan dan Asas Hukum Acara Pidana: Pilar Utama Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia
Keywords:
Objectives, Principles, Criminal Procedure, Indonesian Law EnforcementAbstract
This article discusses the objectives and principles of criminal procedure law as the main pillar in law enforcement in Indonesia. The background of this research is the imbalance between the objectives of law enforcement and the protection of individual rights that often occurs in the practice of criminal procedure law. This study aims to analyze the relevance and implementation of the objectives and principles of criminal procedure law in legal practice in Indonesia. The results of the study show that there is a significant gap between theory and practice, especially in the application of the principle of presumption of innocence and the principle of speedy, simple, and low cost justice. Cases such as wrongful arrest indicate the need for reforms in the law enforcement system, including improved quality of investigations, better access to legal aid, and accountability of law enforcement officials. In conclusion, in order to achieve true justice, comprehensive reforms in the application of criminal procedure law are urgently needed, so that the principles of justice are not only theoretical concepts but also implemented in daily practice.
References
Amin, M. (1981). Hukum acara pengadilan negeri pelajaran untuk mahasiswa, pedoman untuk pengacara dan hakim. Pradnya Paramita.
Dipradja, R. A. S. S. (1977). Pokok-pokok Hukum Acara Pidana. Penerbit Alumni: Bandung.
Hamzah, A. (1987). Pengantar hukum acara pidana Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.
Luntungan, N. G., Rusdi, M., & Sierrad, M. Z. (2023). Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah Dalam Hukum Pidana: Refleksi Hak Asasi Manusia. Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, 2(2), 63–76.
Minggu, K. (2024). AZAS “Presumption Of Innocence” Atau Azas” Praduga Tak Bersalah” Di Negara Hukum Indonesia Sebuah Pemahaman Empirik. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 4(1), 147–154.
Moeljatno, P. P. (1983). Pertanggungjawaban dalam Hukum Pidana. Bina Aksara, Jakarta, 22–23.
Purwoleksono, D. E. (2015). Hukum Acara Pidana. Airlangga University Press.
Ramadhani, A. M., & Ramadi, B. (2023). Realita Perwujudan Asas Equality Before The Law Terhadap Tingkat Kepercayaan Masyarakat Pada Penegakan Hukum (Penerapan Restorative Justice Di Lembaga Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia). Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 1(10), 51–60.
Roni, A. (2023). Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah Dalam Proses Penyidikan. Solusi, 21(1). https://jurnal.unpal.ac.id/index.php/solusi/article/view/805
Rustamaji, M. (2017). Pembaruan Hukum Acara Pidana Melalui Telaah Sisi Kemanusiaan Aparat Penegak Hukum. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 19(1), 1–17.
Sutarto, S. (2005). Hukum Acara Pidana. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Wangol, W. A. (2016). Asas Peradilan Sederhana Cepat dan Biaya Ringan dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Menurut KUHAP. Lex Privatum, 4(7).
